Everything You Don’t Learn About Online Dating Sites (Ep. 154)

Everything You Don’t Learn About Online Dating Sites (Ep. 154)

(picture Credit: non-defining)

This week’s episode is called “What You Don’t Know About Online Dating.” (it is possible to contribute to the podcast at iTunes, get the RSS feed, or pay attention through the news player above. You can also browse the transcript, which includes credits for the songs you’ll notice in the episode.)

The episode is, for the part that is most, an economist’s guide to dating online. (Yes, we all know: sexy!) You’ll hear great tips on building the perfect dating profile, and selecting the most appropriate site (a “thick market,” like Match.com, or “thin,” like GlutenfreeSingles.com?). You’ll learn what you ought to lie about, and what you ought ton’t. Additionally, you’ll learn so how awful a person can be and, if you’re appealing enough, still reel in the times.

First you’ll hear Stephen Dubner interview Alli Reed, a comedy writer residing in la, whom carried out an experiment of sorts on OkCupid:

REED: I wanted to see if there was a lowered restriction to how awful someone could possibly be before males would stop messaging her on an online dating internet site.

So she created a fake profile for the girl she called “AaronCarterFan” (Aaron Carter, for the uninitiated, could be the younger sibling of a Backstreet Boy.) Reed loaded her profile with despicable characteristics ( begin to see the whole list below) but used photos of a model buddy. Within the episode, you’ll hear exactly how this works out. ( For more, see Reed’s Cracked.com article “Four Things we discovered from the Worst Online Dating Profile Ever.“)

Alli Reed’s OkCupid that is fake profile

Then you’ll hear from Paul Oyer, a work economist at Stanford and composer of the brand new guide every thing I Ever needed seriously to learn about Economics I Learned from internet dating . Oyer hadn’t thought much about online dating after a long absence and was struck by the parallels between the dating markets and labor markets until he re-entered the dating scene himself. Only if individuals approached dating like an economist, he thought, they’d be best off.

One brave heart took the task. PJ Vogt, a producer of the public-radio show in The Media and co-host associated with podcast TLDR. Vogt opened their profile that is okCupid to Oyer dissect and, theoretically, improve it. You’ll hear what Vogt had done right, what Oyer thinks was wrong, and what goes on whenever you update your profile, economist-style.

Finally, the economist Justin Wolfers points out one of the more revolutionary benefits of online dating — finding matches in usually “thin” markets:

WOLFERS: it’s a really big deal for young gay and lesbian men and women in otherwise homophobic areas so I do think. It’s additionally a very big deal in the community that is jewish. J-Date. All my Jewish buddies discuss being under some pressure from mum to meet up with good Jewish boy or girl, but they don’t are already everywhere, but they’re all over J-Date. And I also imagine this might be real in other communities that are ethnic. And certainly you will find, it’s enormously an easy task to match on really, extremely specific intimate preferences.

And since online dating sites occasionally leads to offline wedding, we’ll look into that topic in next week’s podcast, in the first of a two-parter called “Why Marry?”


I really liked this podcast but I wished there could be some contrast to the connection with a woman on OkCupid. Ladies in NYC do not have because much choice. And according to OkCupid’s weblog this season, black colored women have actually the least quantity of preference. In my opinion, both of this truth is real. I happened to be messaged, but like Alli Reed pointed out its quite obvious that almost none associated with the men looked over my profile simply the picture. OkCupid has pretty matching that is good, but exactly how many individuals really use it for dates? I’d matches that have been 90-98% but hardly ever gotten communications or replies from all of these guys. Used to do messages that are receive guys who were a 50%-20% match. A lot of guys choices including dating women that are black messaged me based on battle and appears. tna board free trial They did not even take into consideration my friends within the pictures or the activities I became doing. How would an economist solve that problem? Exactly How would he take in consideration that guys just seem to look at photos rather than profiles?

Tags: No tags

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *